Subscribe / Unsubscribe Enewsletters | Login | Register

Pencil Banner

Review: Photos for OS X is faster than iPhoto but less powerful than Aperture

Jeff Carlson | April 9, 2015
Last June, Apple announced the impending retirement of iPhoto and Aperture in favor of Photos for OS X, a new application it demonstrated briefly at the Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC). For most of the intervening 10 months--a long lead time for a company that prefers to ship software soon after announcing it--we didn't know the new application's capabilities.

If you're a longtime Aperture user, Photos is definitely a step back. Or rather, it's the clear signal that says it's time to look for other professional photo pastures. I can't recommend Photos as a full-time replacement, although I can envision situations where it would work alongside Aperture, such as creating small libraries for sharing with clients who don't own Aperture (both iPhoto and Aperture can open a library after it's been converted, but edits don't sync).

And if you're new to the Mac, drawn to Apple's computers after experiencing the iPhone or iPad, Photos for OS X will be immediately familiar, and even improve on your photo experience with better editing tools and iCloud Photo Library syncing.

 

Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6 

Sign up for Computerworld eNewsletters.