Justice Bennett said it was continuing saga in it which would be "extraordinarily" difficult to come to a fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing fee.
"I would have thought it is not at all unreasonable for Samsung to comply with an order to inform Apple whether or not those two people were listed in the attachment. They are entitled to have that information, subject to American law," she said.
"You know who they are, they are your people. All they want to know is are these two people on the list. They are either there or they are not."
The case is ongoing, and will resume on October 24.
Sign up for Computerworld eNewsletters.